Richardson Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7982 (T. D. 36770). [Oral argument, May 3,1917, by Mr. Lane and Mr. Hanson.]
1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge
The issue presented by this appeal is the proper dutiable classification of carbureters for certain tractors. The controversy presents for decision the inclusive scope of paragraph 391 of the present tariff act, reading:
391. Agricultural implements: Plows, tooth and disk harrows, headers, harvesters, reapers, agricultural drills and planters, mowers, horserakes, cultivators, thrashing machines, cotton gins, machinery for use in the manufacture of sugar, wagons, and carts, and all other agricultural implements of any kind and description, whether specifically mentioned herein or not, whether…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. BokerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Stemmer v. Scottish InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- United States v. Ducommun Hardware Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- Reeves & Co. v. BascueSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- United States v. IrwinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- Nyman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Inter Maritime Fwdg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- TAP Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.