Legal Opinion

Nyman v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 9, 1927No. 2815PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

This appeal involves the proper classification of rolls of long perforated strips of cold-rolled steel, tempered, polished, and punched, and of a quality, width, and thickness required for safety-razor blades.

The merchandise was assessed for duty as unfinished blades for safety razors at 1 cent each and 30 per centum ad valorem, under paragraph 358, of the Tariff Act of 1922, which, in part, is as follows:

‡ * * razors and parts thereof, finished or unfinished, * * *; Provided, That finished or unfinished blades for safety razors shall pay a duty of one cent each and 30 per centum ad valorem:…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Worthington v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. United States v. LyonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  4. Athenia Steel & Wire Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. United States v. Buss & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lodge Spark Plug Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  3. United States v. Chesterton Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  4. Paramount Import Export Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  5. Sandvik Steel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API