Legal Opinion

TAP Equipment Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 29, 1967No. C.D. 3051PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richaedson, Judge:

The merchandise of this protest consists of diesel engine valves and bearings which were imported at Los Angeles, Calif., from England and classified hi liquidation as parts of internal-combustion engines of the non-carburetor type under 19 U.S.C.A,., *561section 1001, paragraph 372 (paragraph 372, Tariff Act of 1930) as modified by T.D. 51802 at the duty rate of 10 percentum ad valorem. It is claimed by the plaintiff-importer that some of these valves* and the bearings should be classified under the duty free provision for agricultural implements under 19 U.S.C.A., section…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richardson Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  2. Thrifty Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Express Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. T.A.P. Equipment v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. TAP Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. TAP Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API