TAP Equipment Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Richaedson, Judge:
The merchandise of this protest consists of diesel engine valves and bearings which were imported at Los Angeles, Calif., from England and classified hi liquidation as parts of internal-combustion engines of the non-carburetor type under 19 U.S.C.A,., *561section 1001, paragraph 372 (paragraph 372, Tariff Act of 1930) as modified by T.D. 51802 at the duty rate of 10 percentum ad valorem. It is claimed by the plaintiff-importer that some of these valves* and the bearings should be classified under the duty free provision for agricultural implements under 19 U.S.C.A., section…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Richardson Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- Thrifty Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
3Cited by5 opinions
- American Express Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- T.A.P. Equipment v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- TAP Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- TAP Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968