United States v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMaRtiN, Judge
This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, Third Division, C.D. 1959, sustaining the importer’s protest and holding that the merchandise here involved, consisting of certain so-called after dinner coffee cups and saucers, was erroneously classified by the collector as decorated china tableware under paragraph 212 of the Tariff Act of 1930.
The court below held that the merchandise should have been properly classified, as claimed by the importer, under the same paragraph, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 51802, and the President’s…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Klipstein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- United States v. Ellis Silver Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- Richardson Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- Kubie v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. RiebeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
3Cited by39 opinions
- Aromant Usa, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Arbor Foods, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
- Böhler-Uddeholm Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Baltimore & Ohio R.R. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- Berg v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.