Border Brokerage Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Re, Judge:
The legal question presented in these two protests, consolidated for purposes of trial, pertains to the proper classification, for customs duty purposes, of certain merchandise described on the invoices as plastic planting bullets. The merchandise was imported from Canada in 1966 and 1968. It was classified by the district director as “other articles not specially provided for, of rubber or plastics” under item 774.60 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, and duty was assessed at 17 per centum ad valorem. Plaintiff contends that the plastic planting bullets should be…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Magone v. WiedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. BokerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. LyonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- United States v. American Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Richardson Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Norman G. Jensen, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- The United States v. Border Brokerage Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Border Brokerage Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Amico, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- B. Shackman & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.