Legal Opinion

CC Leasing Corp. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1986No. 85-356PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The two issues presented for review are whether the fuel assemblies must be listed under R.C. 5711.22(C) or (D), and whether the commissioner’s valuation was reasonable. For the reasons set forth below, we must reverse the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals.

I

R.C. 5711.22, as it. applied to tax years 1978-1982, provided:

“(C) Boilers, machinery, equipment, and personal property used for the generation or distribution of electricity other than for the use of the person generating or distributing such electricity shall be listed and assessed as its true value in money on the day that it is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Board of Revision v. FodorOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Conalco, Inc. v. Monroe County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Gulf Oil Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Aluminum Co. of America v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Consolidated Aluminum Corp. v. Monroe County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Meridian Technology Leasing Corp. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Custom Leasing Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Jacob B. Sweeney Equipment Trust v. LimbacOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Chrysler Capital Corporation, F/d/b/a E.F. Hutton Credit Corporation v. First Federal Savings & Loan Association of WarrenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API