Legal Opinion

Consolidated Aluminum Corp. v. Monroe County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1981No. 80-1296PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

First, we point out the obvious law that “the fair market value of property for tax purposes is a question of fact, the determination of which is primarily within the province of the taxing authorities, and this court will not disturb a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals with respect to such valuation unless it affirmatively appears from the record that such decision is unreasonable or unlawful.” Bd. of Revision v. Fodor (1968), 15 Ohio St. 2d 52.

Also, to make it clear at the outset that we adhere to the principle previously set forth in Conalco v. Bd. of Revision (1977), 50 Ohio St. 2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Revision v. FodorOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Conalco, Inc. v. Monroe County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Conalco, Inc. v. Monroe County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ratner v. Stark County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Sapina v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. FirstCal Industrial 2 Acquisitions, L.L.C. v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. St. Bernard Self-Storage, L.L.C. v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. RNG Properties, Ltd. v. Summit Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API