Legal Opinion

Meridian Technology Leasing Corp. v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1995No. 94-994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The Tax Commissioner contends that the BTA disregarded the plain language of R.C. 5725.25(A) and incorrectly focused on the “use of the property.” The commissioner maintains that ownership of the property and assets, not their use, is the criterion for the exemption set forth in R.C. 5725.25(A).

Meridian contends that the computer equipment in question is entitled to exemption pursuant to R.C. 5725.25(A), which provides that domestic insurance companies are subject to real estate taxes, but that the annual franchise tax levied by R.C. 5725.18 “shall be in lieu of all other taxes on the other…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Poe v. SeabornSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Pfeiffer v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. CC Leasing Corp. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roxane Laboratories, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Meridian Technology Leasing Corp. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Roxane Laboratories, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API