Legal Opinion

Aluminum Co. of America v. Kosydar

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1978No. 77-1446PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

The revisory jurisdiction of this court is limited to determining whether the decision of the board is reasonable and lawful. R. C. 5717.04. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Evatt, supra. Essentially, Alcoa maintains that the board’s affirmance of the Tax Commissioner’s “302 determination” of true value of Alcoa’s machinery and equipment in Cuyahoga County, where Alcoa had presented substantial probative evidence of true value, and the Tax Commissioner did not introduce any evidence as to the true value in money of Alcoa’s machinery and equipment, was erroneous, unlawful and unreasonable.1

*480R. C.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Board of Revision v. FodorOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Conalco, Inc. v. Monroe County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. American Steel & Wire Co. of New Jersey v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Episcopal Parish of Christ Church v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. PPG Industries, Inc. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Summit United Methodist Church v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Monsanto Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Tele-Media Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API