Legal Opinion

Board of Revision v. Fodor

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1968No. 68-88PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.

The question presented is whether the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is unreasonable or unlawful. The appellant board of revision contends that the Board of Tax Appeals failed to consider all the evidence of fair market value presented.

The fair market value of a parcel of property at a particular time for tax purposes is a question of fact, the determination of which is primarily within the province of the taxing authorities. Benedict v. Hamilton County Board of Revision, 170 Ohio St. 62. In Hercules Galion Products, Inc., v. Bowers, 171 Ohio St. 176, in a per curiam opinion, *54this court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fair Store Co. v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Smith v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. EOP-BP Tower, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Akron Centre Plaza Ltd. Liability Co. v. Summit County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Mahoning County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Alliance Towers, Ltd. v. Stark County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API