Legal Opinion

Bugbee v. Superior Court

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1928No. Civil No. 2727PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

The Roosevelt Irrigation District, a corporation organized under the laws of the state (chapter 149, Laws 1921 and amendments thereto) for the purpose of supplying water for the irrigation of certain lands of such district, instituted in the Superior Court .of Maricopa county a suit, against Miriam Bugbee and Clinton H. Bugbee and others, to condemn a right of way for its proposed canal over the Bugbees’ farm. On the application of the irrigation district to be put into immediate possession of the property, a hearing was had before the court, at which all interested parties were present. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Central Irrigation District v. De LappeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Turlock Irrigation District v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Day v. Buckeye Water Conservation & Drainage DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation Dist. No. 1 v. WarfordArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Uhlmann v. WrenArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State Ex Rel. Eastvold v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Cienega Cattle Co. v. AtkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Rutledge v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API