Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rutledge v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1966No. 8483PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFarland, Justice:

William L. Rutledge and Velora A. Rutledge, appellants, hereinafter designated plaintiffs, filed a complaint in inverse eminent domain seeking compensation for loss of access to their land in Superior Court, Pima County, against the State of Arizona on November 26, 1962. Plaintiffs appeal from the granting of a motion for summary judgment in favor of the state.

Plaintiffs are the owners of Lot 14, Block 9, Sunset Villa Addition, Tucson, Arizona. On June 8, 1954, the state completed construction of a portion of a controlled-access freeway. The northeast edge of the freeway…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. ThelbergArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Kincaid v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. City of Phoenix v. DonofrioArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation Dist. No. 1 v. WarfordArizona Supreme Court · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital for Magma Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Landgraff v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  3. A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. RANCH 57 v. City of YumaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  5. Uvodich v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API