Legal Opinion
Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation Dist. No. 1 v. Warford
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided May 31, 1949No. 5104PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
De CONCINI, Justice.
L. A. Warford et ux., plaintiffs below, appellees here filed their complaint against appellants, et al. The other defendants were either dropped or the action against them dismissed. The case went to trial on appellees’ first amended complaint and ther supplemental complaint filed the day of the trial. Appellant will hereafter be referred to as the District and appellee Warford as plaintiff.
The District was organized about the year 1925 to reclaim raw desert land for agricultural purposes. The District comprises some 35,000 acres, approximately 25 miles northwest of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Klamath & Moadoc Tribes of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Kincaid v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Lamb v. Reclamation District No. 108California Supreme Court · 1887
- Lebrun v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Local 266, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- State ex rel. Nickoli v. Erie MetroParksOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Adaman Mutual Water Company, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Builders Supply Corporation v. MarshallArizona Supreme Court · 1960
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.