Legal Opinion

Cienega Cattle Co. v. Atkins

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1942No. Civil No. 4446PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

— J. R. Atkins and Christine Atkins, his wife, plaintiffs, brought suit to condemn a strip of land belonging to Cienega Cattle Company, a corporation, defendant, as a passageway for plaintiff’s cattle. The case was tried to the court without a jury, and judgment rendered in favor of plaintiffs, whereupon this appeal was taken.

The facts may be stated as follows: Plaintiffs had homesteaded section 34, township 20 north, range 5 west, G. & S. R. B. & M., while defendant was the owner of the adjoining south half of the southeast quarter of section 33. A National Forest area of considerable size…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Head v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. State v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. State Ex Rel. LaPrade v. CarrowArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Garcia v. SumrallArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. New Keystone Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Carrow Co. v. LusbyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. City of Scottsdale v. Municipal Court of TempeArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation Dist. No. 1 v. WarfordArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Solana Land Co. v. MurpheyArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Coquina Oil Corp. v. Harry Kourlis RanchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API