Summers v. Consolidated Capital Special Trust
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PHILLIPS, Chief Justice.
The principal issue in this case is how to calculate the deficiency or surplus after foreclosure of a mortgage securing a “wraparound note.” The trial court held that the sale price should be credited against the outstanding balance of the note. The court of appeals held that the sale price should be credited against only that portion of the note which exceeds the *581outstanding balance of the underlying, or “non-wrapped,” debt. 737 S.W.2d 327. For the reasons discussed herein, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and affirm the judgment of the trial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Taylor v. BrennanTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- REALTY INVESTMENT CORP. v. SternDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Consolidated Capital Special Trust v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Armsey v. Channel Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986
3Cited by23 opinions
- Conversion Properties, L.L.C. v. Kessler, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1999
- City of Austin v. Houston Lighting & Power Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- Pineda v. PMI Mortgage Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
- Lee v. Key West Towers, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- National Operating, L.P. v. Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.