Legal Opinion

Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. Powell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1941No. 7689PublishedCited by 127 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Alexander

This suit was brought by Clarence Powell and wife against Danciger Oil & Refining Company of Texas and others for damages for failure to develop a certain tract of land for oil and gas mining purposes after oil had been discovered thereon. The only material question to be determined is whether or not, under the contract beteen the parties, there was an implied covenant to so develop the property.

In 1919, G. N. Powell and wife sold a section of land including the land in question to one Eldridge, and reserved and retained an undivided 7/8th interest in and to the minerals, oil, etc., under the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Waggoner Estate v. Sigler Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Freeport Sulphur Co. v. American Sulphur Royalty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Grubb v. McAfeeTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Grass v. Big Creek Development Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Mansfield Gas Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. HECI Exploration Co. v. NeelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Norman v. Apache Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. In Re BassTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Universal Health Services, Inc. v. Renaissance Women's Group, P.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Texas Commerce Bank, N.A. v. Grizzle Ex Rel. GrizzleTexas Supreme Court · 2002

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API