Armsey v. Channel Associates, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STONE, P. J.
Here we are asked to decide the proper method of determining indebtedness remaining after foreclosure sale of an all-inclusive deed of trust where the foreclosing beneficiary remains liable on the underlying liens. Channel Associates, Inc., appellant herein and trustor under an all-inclusive deed of trust on property sold by respondent, Armsey, contends that a beneficiary of an all-inclusive deed of trust has no amount owing him where the difference between the total indebtedness at time of foreclosure and the beneficiary’s successful bid at foreclosure sale equals prior…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cornelison v. KornbluthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Pauline Rosenbaum v. John Funcannon, as Administrator of the Estate of Martha A. Call, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Reynolds v. London & Lancashire Fire Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Brown v. CritchfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Duarte v. Lake Gregory Land and Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- FPCI Re-Hab 01 v. E & G INVESTMENTS, LTD.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Summers v. Consolidated Capital Special TrustTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Alborzian v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Washington Mutual Bank v. JacobyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Najah v. Scottsdale Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.