Legal Opinion

City of Austin v. Houston Lighting & Power Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided October 7, 1992No. 05-89-01354-CVPublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KINKEADE, Justice.

City of Austin (Austin) appeals a take-nothing judgment rendered in favor of Houston Lighting & Power Company and its parent company, Houston Industries, Inc. (collectively HL & P), in this action for breach of a contract to build a nuclear power plant, fraud, and violation of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA). In six points of error, Austin argues that the trial court erred by (1) sustaining HL & P’s special exceptions to Austin’s cause of action for breach of the implied duty to perform the contract with skill and care, (2) overruling Austin’s hearsay…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Gee v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. City of Pinehurst v. Spooner Addition Water Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Federal Election Commission v. National Conservative Political Action CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Sorokolit v. RhodesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Ash v. Hack Branch Distributing Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  3. Melendez v. Exxon Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  4. Vincent v. Bank of America, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  5. Closs v. Goose Creek Consolidated Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1994

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API