Legal Opinion

Lee v. Key West Towers, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1989No. C-6820PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PHILLIPS, Chief Justice.

This case involves two issues: the calculation of a deficiency or surplus after foreclosure of a mortgage securing a “wraparound note,” and the effect of a verified denial filed within seven days of trial. For the reasons set forth in our decision today in Summers v. Consolidated Capital Special Trust, 783 S.W.2d 580 (Tex.1989), we hold that the amount bid at the foreclosure sale should be credited against the outstanding balance of the note. We also hold that under our previous decision in Goswami v. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass'n, 751 S.W.2d 487 (Tex.1988),…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goswami v. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Summers v. Consolidated Capital Special TrustTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Lee v. O'LEARY, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1987

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Martin v. First Rep. Bank, Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Smith Detective Agency & Nightwatch Service, Inc. v. Stanley Smith Security, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
  3. Green v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Hot-Hed, Inc. v. Safehouse Habitats (Scotland), Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  5. In Re Western Star Trucks US, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API