Legal Opinion

Maksymiuk v. Maryland Casualty Insurance

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 20, 1996No. Civil Action 96-1947PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.

Plaintiff filed this action in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas seeking the appointment of uninsured motorist arbitrators under a policy of insurance issued by Defendant. Defendant properly filed a notice of removal to this court.

Defendant has moved for summary judgment. The issue before me is whether 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1731(c.1) provides a remedy to a private litigant for an insurance company’s failure to place in a policy renewal form prominent notice that coverage does not extend to uninsured motorist benefits. Because I find that this section…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LobiondoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Motorists Insurance Companies v. EmigSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Danko v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Lambert v. McClureSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Sturkie v. Erie Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Salazar v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois v. Joseph N. DibartoloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  4. Allstate Insurance Co. v. DeMicheleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Foremost Insurance v. LynchDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API