Legal Opinion

Danko v. Erie Insurance Exchange

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 1993No. 889PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge:

This appeal presents an issue of first impression concerning the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (“MVFRL”). Act of February 12, 1984, P.L. 26, No. 11, § 3, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1701, et seq., effective October 1, 1984. This action was instituted by plaintiff Mary Catherine Danko to recover income loss benefits against defendant Erie Insurance Exchange, her motor vehicle insurer. The plaintiffs action was based upon an interpretation of the MVFRL which differed from that relied upon by the insurer. The appeal arises from an order by the Court of Common Pleas…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Denlinger, Inc. v. DendlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Motley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Lambert v. McClureSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Allwein v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Motorists Insurance Companies v. EmigSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Swarner v. Mutual Benefit GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Burstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Tagliati v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API