Legal Opinion

Motorists Insurance Companies v. Emig

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 27, 1995PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge.

This appeal is from the Order entered in an action in declaratory judgment declaring the underinsurance coverage on a policy of automobile insurance issued to appellee by appellant to be fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) per person and one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) per occurrence.

Appellant, Motorists Insurance Companies, raises two issues on appeal. The first suggests that the trial court failed to apply the proper burden of proof that the statutory “Important Notice” of Section 1791 of the Motor Vehicle Responsibili ty Law (“the MVFRL”), 75 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 1701 et…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Habecker v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Nationwide Insurance Company v. Marian Resseguie Larry C. Resseguie, Personal Representative of the Estate of Richard Resseguie, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. Danko v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Lambert v. McClureSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Sturkie v. Erie Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. BuffettaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Lewis v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Allwein v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Erie Insurance Exchange v. LarrimoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Transguard Ins. Co. of America, Inc. v. HincheyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2006

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API