Legal Opinion

Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois v. Joseph N. Dibartolo

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 18, 1999No. 98-1589PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

EDWARD R. BECKER, Chief Judge.

This case requires us to predict whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court would hold that Pennsylvania law allows a corporation to waive uninsured/underinsured motorist (“UM”) coverage for its employees under a company insurance policy. If we decide that it can, we must then address whether the District Court properly granted summary judgment on the ground that the corporation in this case did so waive. We answer both questions in the affirmative; hence we affirm the judgment of the District Court. 1

I. Facts & Procedural History

The basic facts…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Thibodeaux v. BurtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  3. Salazar v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Donnelly v. BauerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Lokay v. Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farmers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. BuffettaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Alphonse Hotel Corp. v. TranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  3. Mall Chevrolet Inc v. General Motors LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
  4. Douglas v. Discover Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Delta Funding Corporation v. Alberta HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API