Legal Opinion

Willard H. George, Ltd. v. Barnett

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1944No. Civ. A. 5747PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, P. J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment given under section 689 of the Code of Civil Procedure in favor of the third party claimant after a levy of execution. The property levied upon, a 1942 model automobile, was bought from a dealer in November, 1941, on a conditional sale contract, was then registered with the State Vehicle Department in the name of the claimant’s mother, who is the defendant against whom the execution runs, and remained so registered at the time of the levy.

The plaintiff contends that the registration of the automobile as above stated makes it subject to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kinnison v. Guaranty Liquidating Corp.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Gomez v. CecenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Goes v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Altramano v. SwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Quinn v. ReillyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Henry v. General Forming, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Harbor Insurance v. PaulsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Gates v. LeversCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Siegel v. BaylessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Triggs v. ZicovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API