Legal Opinion
Quinn v. Reilly
California Supreme Court
Decided April 19, 1926No. Docket No. S.F. 11073PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
This action was commenced by William Joseph Quinn against his sister, Nellie E. Reilly (her husband being joined), to have Nellie E. Reilly declared a trustee holding certain realty and improvements for the benefit of the estate of their father, Patrick P. Quinn.
It appears that in 1921 Patrick P. Quinn purchased certain property, the deed running to himself and his daughter, Nellie E. Reilly.
The lower court sustained a demurrer, without leave to amend, to appellant’s amended complaint, and the appeal is from the resulting judgment in respondent’s favor.
The allegation to which the demurrer was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hamilton v. HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Croley v. California Pacific R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Faylor v. FaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Russ v. MebiusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Elliott v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
3Cited by14 opinions
- Oyama v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Gomez v. CecenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Altramano v. SwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Taylor v. Oakland Scavenger Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.