Legal Opinion
Altramano v. Swan
California Supreme Court
Decided July 30, 1942No. L. A. 17819PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
The appellants, Lillian J. Swan and Juanita Swan Foreman, her daughter, were sued by the judgment creditors of W. W. Swan in an action to subject an Oldsmobile automobile and certain Postal Certificates to the payment of the judgment.
The complaint contains five counts. In the first three of them, the respondents assert that W. W. Swan fraudulently transferred property owned by him to Lillian J. Swan, his wife, and Juanita Swan Foreman, his daughter. In the fourth count, the judgment creditors claim that W. W. Swan transferred the property in controversy to his wife and daughter in trust for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Van Maren v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Lezinsky v. Mason Malt Whiskey Distilling Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Wendling Lumber Co. v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Hamilton v. HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Fish v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Fidelity National Title Insurance v. SchroederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Estate of ClausseniusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Lloyds Bank California v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.