Legal Opinion

Harbor Insurance v. Paulson

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 15, 1955No. Civ. 16309PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

In an action for declaratory relief, both parties appeal upon an agreed statement. Plaintiff and cross-defendant appeals from the judgment against it in the sum of $11,371.37. Defendant and cross-complainant appeals claiming the judgment in his favor should have been for $16,371.27.

Questions Presented

1. Did the public liability policy cover a vendee of an automobile sold him by the insured where the formalities for transfer of ownership required by the Vehicle Code were not complied with ?

2. Was the Pronce judgment res judicata of this question?

3. If so covered, is plaintiff entitled to a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Lynch v. BirdwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Virginia Auto Mutual Insurance v. BrillhartSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  4. Norris v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Henry v. General Forming, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1948

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Maryland Cas. Co. v. American Family Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Exchange Casualty & Surety Co. v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Collins v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Truck Insurance Exchange v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API