Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Murray

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 1965No. Appeal, 394PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

The appellant-defendant, John Murray, was convicted by Judge Lefever, sitting without a jury, on charges of offering to bribe and bribing a corporate employe in violation of the Act of June 24, 1939, P. L. 872, §667, 18 P.S. §4667.

Defendant now contends (1) that the Philadelphia court did not have jurisdiction, (2) that there was an illegal interception of a telephone conversation the substance of which was for that reason erroneously admitted into evidence, (3) that the evidence did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the alleged bribing was committed without…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Rathbun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Commonwealth v. BRUNOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Commonwealth v. FriedmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Parkhurst v. KlingDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Parkhurst v. KlingDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Commonwealth v. McCoySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Commonwealth v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Commonwealth v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API