Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McCoy

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 1970No. Appeal, No. 380PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Spaulding, J.,

On July 29, 1967, Donald Palace received a telephone call threatening that Palace would be killed if he did not pay the caller. Before a second call was received Palace informed the police of the first call and had an amplifier-recorder set up to overhear the conversation. The device was held next to the earpiece of the phone so that the receiver could still hear. There was no physical connection between the telephone and the equipment. The caller was not advised that the conversation was being overheard and recorded. As a result of the information recorded that day…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Goldman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Rathbun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Commonwealth v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. BaldwinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API