Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Smith

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1958No. Appeals, 62 and 63PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

The appellant, Pete Smith, was indicted to Nos. 108 and 109, June Sessions, 1957, on charges of bookmaking and pool selling and conspiracy to do an unlawful act. There were four codefendants on the conspiracy charge, each of whom ivas also indicted separately on a charge of bookmaking and pool selling. One of the codefendants, Sam Plotnick, was also indicted on a charge of keeping a gaming house. All these indictments were consolidated for trial, at the conclusion of which the appellant and each of his codefendants were found guilty by a jury on all charges. After…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Commonwealth v. TauzaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Commonwealth v. ShieldsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  4. Commonwealth v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. Commonwealth v. MorrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CammSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. State v. CarboneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  3. Commonwealth v. ProettoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. BRUNOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Commonwealth v. REICHARDSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API