Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Friedman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1960No. Appeal, 327PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence of the Court of Quarter Sessions of Philadelphia County by Harold Friedman, the defendant-appellant, after conviction of bribery and from the denial by the said court of motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial.

Friedman was indicted for the statutory crime of bribery in an athletic contest as set forth in the Act of July 19, 1951, P.L. 1071, 18 PS §4614, which reads as follows: “Whoever gives or promises or offers, . . . to anyone who participates or expects to participate in any professional or amateur game . . .…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Allen v. MackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Commonwealth v. StalloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Hester v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  4. JOHNSONS v. Peoples Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Risbon v. CottomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MARINOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Commonwealth v. COHENSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Pueblo v. Cortés del CastilloSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
  4. Commonwealth v. PerrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. FrancisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API