Parkhurst v. Kling
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KRAFT, District Judge.
Now before the Court for disposition are three motions. Initially the plaintiff filed a motion to compel answers from a deponent concerning telephone conversations between the plaintiff and the witness which plaintiff had recorded. Thereupon, the defendant countered with a motion to dismiss for plaintiff’s failure to comply with three notices of deposition sent to counsel for the plaintiff by defendant’s counsel. Plaintiff’s counsel then filed a motion for a protective order to preclude the defendant from taking the plaintiff’s deposition except on such *316terms as the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rathbun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Commonwealth v. BRUNOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Waldo Kent Ferguson and Robert Lowell Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Commonwealth v. MurraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- United States v. AlexanderDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. VespeDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
- Parkhurst v. KlingDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Kalosha v. NovickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Smith v. Cincinnati Post & Times StarDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1972