Legal Opinion
Weiner v. Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 29, 1980No. Civ. 57548PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COBEY, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff, Julian Weiner, appeals from a judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 581d) dismissing, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 581, subdivision 3, this action following his noticed failure to amend further his second amended complaint as expressly authorized by the trial court in its minute order sustaining the various demurrers (both general and special) of defendants thereto.
Facts
Plaintiff in his second amended complaint attempted to state causes of action for malpractice, conspiracy, fraud and deceit, breach of fiduciary duty and interference with prospective…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
- UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Julian S. H. WEINER, Marvin Al Lichtig and Solomon Block, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Love v. WolfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Dryden v. Tri-Valley GrowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Swaffield v. Universal Ecsco Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Peeler v. Hughes & LuceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Coscia v. McKenna & CuneoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Wiley v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Glenn v. AikenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.