Legal Opinion
Norwood v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 23, 1991No. Civ. 90-1140-PAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PANNER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Carroll Norwood, Todd Gunder-son, and Joe Amhaz bring this diversity action against Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO), for violations of Oregon’s Motor Fuel Franchise Act and for tortious bad faith and unfair dealing. Defendant moves for summary judgment on both claims. I grant the motion.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs and defendant are parties to individual franchise agreements. Pursuant to the agreements, defendant grants each plaintiff a franchise for an AM7PM Mini Market and an ARCO facility. Upon entering these franchise relationships, each plaintiff signed…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Steelworkers of America v. Phelps Dodge Corporation, a New York Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Albrecht v. Herald Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Simpson v. Union Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- C. O. Hanson v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Draper v. Astoria School District No. 1CDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1998
- Towne v. RobbinsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2004
- Towne v. RobbinsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2004
- Roller v. HerreraDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019