Legal Opinion

Towne v. Robbins

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided October 12, 2004No. Civil 02-1688-MOPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MOSMAN, District Judge.

In this franchise dispute, plaintiffs bring several claims against well-known motivational speaker Tony Robbins and his companies. On September 7, 2004, the court held that plaintiffs’ claims under the Oregon Franchise Act were largely barred by the Act’s limitations provision. See Towne v. Robbins, 331 F.Supp.2d 1269 (D.Or. 2004). The issue now before the court is whether plaintiffs’ ORICO, RICO, fraud, and special-relationship claims also are time barred. For the reasons discussed below, the court holds that these claims are barred, except to the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Hobson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. Grimmett v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Apex Towing Co. v. TolinTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pinigis v. Regions BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  2. Estate of Brice Ex Rel. Tracy A. v. Toyota Motor Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API