Towne v. Robbins
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MOSMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Robert A. Towne and Cynthia J. Towne, husband and wife, along with their company Towne-Murphy, (collectively, “the Townes”) contend they were swindled by well-known motivational speaker Anthony Robbins and his companies. Plaintiffs contend Robbins duped them into entering into a franchise agreement. Only one narrow issue stands ready for decision: whether plaintiffs’ Oregon Franchise Act claim fails as a matter of law because it is time-barred under the Act’s limitations provision. As discussed below, the court answers that issue in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gladhart v. Oregon Vineyard Supply Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Kathy Philpott v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Huff v. Great Western Seed Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Norwood v. Atlantic Richfield Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1991
3Cited by1 opinion
- Towne v. RobbinsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2004