Legal Opinion

Albrecht v. Herald Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 8, 1968No. 43PublishedCited by 449 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

A jury returned a verdict for respondent in petitioner’s suit for treble damages for violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act.1 Judgment was entered on the verdict and the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed. 367 F. 2d 517 (1966). The question is whether the denial of petitioner’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was correctly affirmed by the Court of Appeals. Because this case presents important issues under the antitrust laws, we granted certiorari. 386 U. S. 941 (1967).

*147We take the facts from those stated by the Court of Appeals. Respondent publishes the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. Trenton Potteries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by449 opinions

  1. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State Oil Co. v. KhanSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

444 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API