Abbott v. Kodiak Island Borough Assembly as the Assembly
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
Jennifer Abbott, John Shank, and Virginia Shank (“Owners”) appeal a superior court award of attorney’s fees to the Kodiak Island Borough Assembly (“Assembly”) arising out of a zoning controversy. Owners argue that the superior court erroneously decided that they are not public interest litigants. Owners also argue that the attorney’s fees were excessive, unnecessary, and based on duplicated services.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
In 1991, intending to build a housing development, the Natives of Kodiak applied for the rezoning of a piece of property and for preliminary…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anchorage v. McCabeAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Oceanview Homeowners Ass'n v. Quadrant Construction & EngineeringAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Cook Inlet Pipe Line Co. v. Alaska Public Utilities CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Lyman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Eyak Traditional Elders Council v. Sherstone, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Roberts v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Tenala, Ltd. v. FowlerAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Fairbanks Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 1324 v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Ogar v. City of HainesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.