Legal Opinion
Anchorage v. McCabe
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided September 9, 1977No. 2737PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Justice.
In this case, the City of Anchorage appeals the superior court’s award of $5,151.41 in costs and attorney’s fees to two of the appellees, David and Janet McCabe.
On January 15, 1975, appellee Edward Carlstrom petitioned the G.A.A.B. Planning and Zoning Commission for a special exception to the zoning ordinance for construction of a Planned Unit Development (hereinafter P.U.D.).1 After holding a public hearing on the matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted Carlstrom permission to build two eleven-story buildings at the northwest corner of West 13th Avenue and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Gilbert v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Palfy v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Tobeluk Ex Rel. Tobeluk v. LindAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. HaleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. Native Village of NunapitchukAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Kenai Lumber Co., Inc. v. LeRescheAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.