Legal Opinion

Eyak Traditional Elders Council v. Sherstone, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1995No. S-5844PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

The Eyak Traditional Elders Council and five individual Eyak Natives (collectively the “Council”) sought unsuccessfully to prevent Sherstone, Inc. from elearcut harvesting a 50-acre tract of timber believed to be the location of an historic Eyak village and burial ground. Following the Council’s motion to voluntarily dismiss pursuant to Civil Rule 41(a)(2), the superior court dismissed the case with prejudice and awarded partial attorney’s fees and costs to appellees Sher-stone, Inc., the Eyak Corporation, and Sound Development, Inc. (collectively “Sherstone”). The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Anchorage v. McCabeAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Kenai Lumber Co., Inc. v. LeRescheAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Oceanview Homeowners Ass'n v. Quadrant Construction & EngineeringAlaska Supreme Court · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Municipality of Anchorage v. GentileAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Valley Hospital Ass'n v. Mat-Su Coalition for ChoiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. O'CALLAGHAN v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Gwich'in Steering Committee v. State, Office of the GovernorAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Alaska Conservation Foundation v. Pebble Limited PartnershipAlaska Supreme Court · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API