Legal Opinion
Tenala, Ltd. v. Fowler
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided December 23, 1999No. S-8625PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Audrey Fowler brought a quiet title action against Tenala, Ltd. Fowler prevailed and was awarded enhanced attorney’s fees. We agree that enhanced attorney’s fees were proper. However, we remand so that the superior court can make specific findings on whether some of the fees claimed by Fowler were actually related to this litigation.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
In 1991 Fowler, the representative of Sally Mayo’s estate, brought a quiet title action against Tenala, Ltd., involving two lots in Fairbanks. 1 After a three-day bench trial, the superior…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Osborne v. HurstAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Tenala, Ltd. v. FowlerAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Gold Bondholders Protective Council v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ware v. WareAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Monzingo v. Alaska Air Group, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Matanuska Electric Ass'n v. Chugach Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Cole v. BartelsAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Alaska Wildlife Alliance v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.