Legal Opinion

Ogar v. City of Haines

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 2002No. S-9812PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Did a city’s prior failures to require property owners to remove structures that violated its right-of-way and setback requirements equitably estop the city from requiring the current landowner to remove them? Because the city asserted no “position by conduct or word,” a necessary element for equitable estoppel was absent. We therefore affirm the grant of summary judgment for the city. We also affirm the superior court’s award of attorney’s fees against the landowner.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

This appeal concerns claims Phyllis Ogar brought against the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Palfy v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Tobeluk Ex Rel. Tobeluk v. LindAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Bohna v. HUGHES, THORSNESS, GANTZAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Municipality of Anchorage v. SchneiderAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Town of Chouteau v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tufco, Inc. v. Pacific Environmental Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Alaska Fur Gallery, Inc. v. First National Bank AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. United States Ex Rel. North Star Terminal & Stevedore Co. v. Nugget Construction, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 2006
  4. Black v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Dickson v. State, Dept. of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API