Legal Opinion

Goodell v. Humboldt County

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 5, 1998No. 97-790PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

The regulation of livestock confinement operations is a matter of growing public debate in this state. In the case before us, livestock producers have challenged four ordinances adopted by the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors that regulate large livestock confinement facilities and operations. The plaintiffs claim the ordinances are invalid because they address a matter of statewide concern, and because the county’s authority has been preempted by the Iowa legislature. The defendants seek to sustain the validity of the ordinances as a valid exercise of the county’s home…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Sun Valley Iowa Lake Ass'n v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  2. State v. CroneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  3. Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Van Baale v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  5. Weinhold v. WolffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Anne Hensler Vs. City Of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. Midwest Automotive III, LLC v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  3. Baker v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  4. Miller v. Marshall CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  5. City of Davenport v. SeymourSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API