Legal Opinion

Altenburg v. Board of Supervisors

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 5, 2000No. C9-99-2133PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.

Appellants Michael and Karen Alten-burg sought to build an animal feedlot on their property. Feedlots are prohibited by a Pleasant Mound Township ordinance. Accordingly, appellants commenced the present action alleging that the ordinance is invalid. The district court determined that the township ordinance was valid and entered summary judgment in favor of the township.

On appeal, appellants argue that, in light of county ordinances relating to the same subject matter, the township’s ordinance was invalid and preempted. Appellants also argue that the township’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. City of Mounds ViewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. C AND R STACY, LLC v. County of ChisagoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Custody of A.V.A. v. RatchaneewanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  3. In Re the Appeal of RocheleauCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Motokazie! Inc. v. Rice CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  5. West Circle Properties LLC v. HallCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API