Legal Opinion
Whipple v. Haberle
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 17, 1963No. Civ. 242PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of all defendants in a suit for declaratory relief, and in favor of cross-complainants for the restitution of premises and treble damages for unlawful withholding of possession.
Chester D. and Angie M. Haberle, husband and wife, owned residential property in the “Re-subdivision of Thousand Oaks” at Modesto; they listed it for sale with Campbell Real Estate operated exclusively by the defendant Brooks; the sale was to be for cash or cash through new loan. On August 1, 1959, Brooks obtained from appellants, Leonard L. Whipple and his wife, Edwina D.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Duff v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Richard v. Degen & Brody, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shane v. HoffmannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Twomey v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Lynch v. Surprise Valley Lodge No. 235California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Sasson v. KatashCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Whipple v. CowdreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965