Legal Opinion
Whipple v. Cowdrey
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 30, 1965No. Civ. 400PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
— Appellants Whipple, husband and wife, appeal from an order taxing costs arising from a prior appeal. (Whipple v. Haberle, 223 Cal.App.2d 477 [36 Cal.Rptr. 9].) Appellant Cowdrey challenges one item of cost allowed. Because both parties are appellants here and Whipples were appellants and Cowdrey was a respondent in the prior appeal, we shall herein refer to the Whipples as “plaintiffs” and to Cowdrey as11 defendant. ’ ’
The background of the litigation is, briefly, that plaintiffs brought an action against five defendants, some of whose interests were identical. Two of the defendants, Mr.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lane v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Haydel v. MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Combs v. HaddockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Weck v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Whipple v. HaberleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Marriage of JovelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Ramirez v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Schwartz v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969