Legal Opinion
Sasson v. Katash
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 17, 1983No. Civ. 67956PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FEINERMAN, P. J.
Appellant, Jack Katash (Katash), appeals from a judgment against him in an unlawful detainer action.
The trial court found that Katash continued to occupy premises at 354 South Broadway in the City of Los Angeles for five months and nine days after the expiration of a written lease agreement and written lease assumption agreement entered into with respondents Eli and Lillian Sasson (collectively, Sasson). The court also found that Katash’s continued possession of the subject premises was “wilful, intentional, deliberate, obstinate and malicious.” The court held that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re LifschutzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Valley Bank of Nevada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Buck v. MorrossisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Fifth & Broadway Partnership v. Kimny, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lantz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Sehlmeyer v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Roth v. Morton's Chefs Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- California Consumer Health Care Council v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006