Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 29, 1926No. 25,030PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, O. J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of selling intoxicating liquor. He now appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

It is urged that the information fails: (1) To state that the sale was not for permitted purposes; and (2) that it does not state that the liquor was sold for the purpose of being used as a beverage and contained one-half of one per cent or more of alcohol by volume.

G. S. 1923, § 3201, prohibits the sale of intoxicating liquor. The words “the * * * gale * * * of * * * intoxicating liquor * * * is prohibited within this state” define the offense.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Groff v. RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. State v. TremontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. State v. CorcoranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  5. State v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. UmlaufSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. City of Duluth v. SidenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API