State v. Miller
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Wilson, O. J.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of selling intoxicating liquor. He now appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
It is urged that the information fails: (1) To state that the sale was not for permitted purposes; and (2) that it does not state that the liquor was sold for the purpose of being used as a beverage and contained one-half of one per cent or more of alcohol by volume.
G. S. 1923, § 3201, prohibits the sale of intoxicating liquor. The words “the * * * gale * * * of * * * intoxicating liquor * * * is prohibited within this state” define the offense.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Groff v. RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- State v. TremontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- State v. CorcoranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- State v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. UmlaufSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- City of Duluth v. SidenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926