City of Duluth v. Siden
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.
Defendant was arrested, tried in the municipal court of the city of Duluth, and convicted of having in his possession, for sale, a certain quantity of intoxicating liq'uor, and was sentenced to the county work farm for the term of 85 days. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, he appealed to the district court where the order of the municipal court was affirmed. This appeal followed.
It is here urged: (1) That it was error to deny defendant’s motion for an order dismissing the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; (2) for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Bepley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
- State v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- State v. McGinnisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- State v. McLeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. ScheidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932