Legal Opinion

City of Duluth v. Siden

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 15, 1926No. 25,514PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

Defendant was arrested, tried in the municipal court of the city of Duluth, and convicted of having in his possession, for sale, a certain quantity of intoxicating liq'uor, and was sentenced to the county work farm for the term of 85 days. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, he appealed to the district court where the order of the municipal court was affirmed. This appeal followed.

It is here urged: (1) That it was error to deny defendant’s motion for an order dismissing the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; (2) for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  2. Bepley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
  3. State v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. State v. McGinnisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  5. State v. McLeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ScheidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API