Legal Opinion
Abramson v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 16, 1998No. Nos. 96-480C, 96-4801CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
FACTS
The plaintiffs in these cases are 1008 former or current employees of the United States Customs Service, United States Department of the Treasury.1 Most are employed as customs inspectors or import specialists, with the remainder holding one of several other positions.2 They allege that, beginning as early as August 27, 1989, the defendant illegally failed to pay overtime wages at the rate required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219 (West 1994 & Supp.1998), and instead paid them at a lower Federal Employment Pay Act (“FEPA”) rate set forth…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Robert O. Mudge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- O'Connor v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Abbott v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Grandits v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.